Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option for specifying specific application for input run #20066

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

lindsayad
Copy link
Member

Closes #20062

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Jan 18, 2022

Job Documentation on 636019d wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Jan 18, 2022

Job Coverage on 636019d wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

6b91c6 #20066 636019
Total Total +/- New
Rate 82.30% 82.31% +0.01% 100.00%
Hits 73297 73295 -2 11
Misses 15759 15749 -10 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

This comment will be updated on new commits.

loganharbour
loganharbour previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2022
Copy link
Member

@loganharbour loganharbour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While it is a draft - looks good to me

I personally have never run across this error in any real user
experiences, so I question whether it has any real value. Moreover this
error check prevents executing a specific application of a "combined"
application like blue_crab because the blue_crab executable contains
registry entries for all the objects compiled into the executable (or
more appropriately all the objects in the executable with register calls
in their .C file) yet we only `registerAll` for the specific application
we are executing. So if specifically running Griffin for example, we get
tons of errors about labels/applications: Bison, SAM, Pronghorn, etc.
@lindsayad lindsayad marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2022 17:29
@lindsayad
Copy link
Member Author

@loganharbour this is ready to review. If you approve, I'll wait to merge until we've worked out the next kerfuffle

@lindsayad lindsayad self-assigned this Jan 21, 2022
@loganharbour loganharbour merged commit 03bf4c5 into idaholab:next Jan 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create an --app command line parameter
3 participants