Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDEMPIERE-4902 : Record migration scripts with Dictionnary EntityType #816

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

nmicoud
Copy link
Contributor

@nmicoud nmicoud commented Aug 5, 2021

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@CarlosRuiz-globalqss CarlosRuiz-globalqss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @nmicoud - test didn't work when the AdempiereSys variable is not set.

Can you please integrate the following changes:
pull816_PR.txt

And after applied, please move the scripts to folder i8.2

The change also implement the suggestion from @hieplq at IDEMPIERE-2523

nmicoud and others added 3 commits August 5, 2021 13:59
… - fix migration scripts

Co-Authored-By: Carlos Ruiz <carg67@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Carlos Ruiz <carg67@gmail.com>
@CarlosRuiz-globalqss CarlosRuiz-globalqss merged commit 9970182 into idempiere:master Aug 5, 2021
@nmicoud nmicoud deleted the IDEMPIERE-4902 branch August 5, 2021 15:06
CarlosRuiz-globalqss added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2021
…#816)

* IDEMPIERE-4902 : Record migration scripts with Dictionnary EntityType

* IDEMPIERE-4902 : Record migration scripts with Dictionnary EntityType - fix migration scripts

Co-Authored-By: Carlos Ruiz <carg67@gmail.com>

* IDEMPIERE-4902 : Record migration scripts with Dictionnary EntityType - move migration scripts to i8.2

* IDEMPIERE-2523

Co-Authored-By: Carlos Ruiz <carg67@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Carlos Ruiz <carg67@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants