You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using the latest version (v7.5.1), and when I load the gene sets as such: sets <- as.data.frame(msigdbr(species = "Homo sapiens")), I have seen that there are some pathways labelled with gs_subcat == CP but which are actually from gs_subcat == CGP. One example are pathways from the NABA study: NABA_BASEMENT_MEMBRANES, NABA_MATRISOME, etc. These are listed as CGP pathways in the MSigDB website (e.g.: https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/cards/NABA_MATRISOME).
What do you think could have happened for these CGP pathways to end up labelled as CP within msigdbr and do you think you can provide a solution for this?
thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The gene sets can change categories between different versions of MSigDB. Although NABA_MATRISOME is in CGP now, it used to be in CP (see archived gene set page).
Hi!
thanks for the great software.
I'm using the latest version (
v7.5.1
), and when I load the gene sets as such:sets <- as.data.frame(msigdbr(species = "Homo sapiens"))
, I have seen that there are some pathways labelled withgs_subcat == CP
but which are actually fromgs_subcat == CGP
. One example are pathways from the NABA study:NABA_BASEMENT_MEMBRANES
,NABA_MATRISOME
, etc. These are listed as CGP pathways in the MSigDB website (e.g.: https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/cards/NABA_MATRISOME).What do you think could have happened for these CGP pathways to end up labelled as CP within
msigdbr
and do you think you can provide a solution for this?thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: