Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ITI-65 Expected actions -- should to shall #60

Closed
lynnfel opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

ITI-65 Expected actions -- should to shall #60

lynnfel opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working the way intended.
Milestone

Comments

@lynnfel
Copy link
Contributor

lynnfel commented Apr 29, 2021

Section Number https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD/ITI-65.html#expected-actions

Issue change should to shall in the 1st sentence below, since the following 2 sentences contain shall

Proposed Change The Document Recipient should verify the FHIR resource elements for consistency with the Document Sharing metadata requirements as specified for attributes ITI TF-3: Table 4.3.1-3: “Sending Actor Metadata Attribute Optionality”. The Document Recipient that supports the “Comprehensive Metadata” or the “XDS on FHIR” Option shall validate against column “XDS DS”; otherwise the Document Recipient should validate against column “XDR MS”.

Priority:

  • Low: Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion.
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Apr 30, 2021
@lynnfel
Copy link
Contributor Author

lynnfel commented Apr 30, 2021

OK. Then I suggest removing the should from the 1st sentence as follows:
"The Document Recipient verifies the FHIR resource elements for consistency according to the Document Sharing metadata requirements as specified for attributes ITI TF-3: Table 4.3.1-3: “Sending Actor Metadata Attribute Optionality”:
-- The Document Recipient that supports the “Comprehensive Metadata” or the “XDS on FHIR” Option shall validate against column “XDS DS”
-- Otherwise, the Document Recipient should validate against column “XDR MS”.

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke self-assigned this May 5, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added bug Something isn't working the way intended. and removed invalid This doesn't seem right labels May 5, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added this to the 4.0.0 milestone May 5, 2021
@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

will work on wording clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working the way intended.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants