Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sugarizer v1.1.0 -> v1.2.0 #1966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2019
Merged

Sugarizer v1.1.0 -> v1.2.0 #1966

merged 1 commit into from Sep 26, 2019

Conversation

holta
Copy link
Member

@holta holta commented Sep 26, 2019

@llaske plz let us know if an accompanying sugarizer-server release (at https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer-server/releases) is also expected?

Thanks!

Refs: #1437 llaske/sugarizer#356

@holta holta added this to the 7.0 milestone Sep 26, 2019
@holta
Copy link
Member Author

holta commented Sep 26, 2019

FYI quick testing of http://box/sugarizer works — after reinstalling Sugarizer 1.2.0 on top of pre-existing IIAB 7.0's Sugarizer 1.1.0 + Sugarizer-Server 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 18.04 or Raspbian Lite, by running cd /opt/iiab/iiab ; ./runrole sugarizer as root.

(FYI /opt/iiab/sugarizer-1.2.0 is 571 MB, as compared to 419 MB for /opt/iiab/sugarizer-1.1.0, on both OS's...)

@holta holta merged commit 087da9f into iiab:master Sep 26, 2019
@llaske
Copy link

llaske commented Sep 28, 2019

@holta yes a future Sugarizer Server version is planned, probably in November. Will be named 1.2.0 too.

BTW Sugarizer 1.2.0 could work with any version of Sugarizer Server 1.x.x. Only the "unlimited storage" feature could require the future Sugarizer Server version if you want to store on the server Journal items > 8Mb.

Regarding increasing of size between Sugarizer 1.1.0 and Sugarizer 1.2.0 it's related to integration of Scratch library items so Scratch could fully work without Internet connection. For people with an Internet connection it's possible to reduce the Sugarizer size as explained here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants