Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Describe "sc:painting" better #35

Closed
azaroth42 opened this issue Feb 27, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Describe "sc:painting" better #35

azaroth42 opened this issue Feb 27, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

Documentation Improvement: The specification was interpreted incorrectly recently as the reader did not understand the use of painting for transcription. The reader viewed transcription as metadata, not part of a facsimile. The specification could be clearer as to this common situation.

Notes:

  • What does “painting” mean? Perhaps choose different vocabulary to denote “representation” or 1:1 relationship vs. other types of relationships
  • add sub-classes?
  • Perhaps rename painting as confusing, esp in Gallery use cases?

Decision:
Couldn't come up with a better motivation, so describe better and leave as painting (esp for backwards compatibility)

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

closed with approval

@azaroth42 azaroth42 added this to the Presentation 2.0 milestone May 13, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant