Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sittingToStandingTransform should describe ordering of matrix components #64

Closed
kearwood opened this issue Aug 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@kearwood
Copy link
Contributor

kearwood commented Aug 9, 2016

To avoid confusion, we should document the ordering of the matrix components returned by sittingToStandingTransform. It should be described as a 4x4 affine transformation matrix in column-major order.

@dmarcos
Copy link
Contributor

dmarcos commented Aug 10, 2016

Fixed by #70

@dmarcos dmarcos closed this as completed Aug 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants