You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should add a generic section stating some analysis types work over .beam files and then, per rule, have a "Works on .beam?" reference.
e.g.
beam_files
Certain rules (signaled with "Works on .beam file? Yes!") allow you to perform analysis directly on beam files (instead of source code).
Though this analysis may be useful for pin-pointing certain elements, beware that, e.g., reported line_numbers will most surely not corresponding to those in the source file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should add a generic section stating some analysis types work over .beam files and then, per rule, have a "Works on .beam?" reference.
e.g.
beam_files
Certain rules (signaled with "Works on
.beam
file? Yes!") allow you to perform analysis directly on beam files (instead of source code).Though this analysis may be useful for pin-pointing certain elements, beware that, e.g., reported line_numbers will most surely not corresponding to those in the source file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: