Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0] Move Product pack to OCA? #244

Closed
rafaelbn opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

[8.0] Move Product pack to OCA? #244

rafaelbn opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@rafaelbn
Copy link

rafaelbn commented Dec 7, 2015

Hi @ingadhoc @jjscarafia

We are going to continue this work in OCA

OCA/product-attribute#6

@pedrobaeza told us that you have same work here: https://github.com/ingadhoc/odoo-addons/tree/8.0/product_pack

I think best way is moving https://github.com/ingadhoc/odoo-addons/tree/8.0/product_pack yo OCA

What do you think?

Thanks
Regards,
Rafael

@rafaelbn rafaelbn changed the title [8.0] Product pack [8.0] Move Product pack to OCA? Dec 7, 2015
@jjscarafia
Copy link
Contributor

We have a pending task to move it to OCA
I'm in my honey moon, on my return I can work on this of if you prefer just
make a PR and add it to OCA.
Thanks!

El lun., dic. 7, 2015 19:05, Rafael Blasco notifications@github.com
escribió:

Hi @ingadhoc https://github.com/ingadhoc @jjscarafia
https://github.com/jjscarafia

We are going to continue this work in OCA

OCA/product-attribute#6 OCA/product-attribute#6

@pedrobaeza https://github.com/pedrobaeza told us that you have same
work here: https://github.com/ingadhoc/odoo-addons/tree/8.0/product_pack

I think best way is moving
https://github.com/ingadhoc/odoo-addons/tree/8.0/product_pack yo OCA

What do you think?

Thanks
Regards,
Rafael


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#244.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Author

Done, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants