-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tunnel-client "Failed to connect to proxy" errors #7
Comments
Hi @juan-lee thank you for getting in touch. What Kubernetes distribution are you using? I've used KinD, k3s, kubeadm, and k3d successfully without issue. If you suspect issues with the Want to give that a try? Alex |
Quoting the blog post for this isn't helpful because it clearly works for around half a dozen people already and there's a video showing it too. Could you give more info? i.e.
|
Although this only occurs with KinD, I've changed the control port from the same as the data-plane to an alternative port. It appears to unblock KinD and fix an issue reported by a user. Fixes: #7 Signed-off-by: Alex Ellis (OpenFaaS Ltd) <alexellis2@gmail.com>
Can you try the |
@alexellis I confirmed the code in master now works as advertised. I actually got it working for myself while building a proof-of-concept azure container instance provisioner. I just discovered inlets yesterday on @lachie83's recommendation. Thanks for sharing and great work! I'd love to help out if you're open to it. |
It's merged into master now and ready to go, if you want to try again. Happy to review your PR this week 👍 Delete is now implemented too. Alex |
While going through the blog post I encountered errors with the tunnel client not being able to connect to the droplet or other tunnel server. The problem seems to be due to the dataplane, control, and service ports being the same.
Expected Behaviour
Tunnel client should be able to connect to the tunnel server to expose a private service via an inlet.
Current Behaviour
The tunnel client pod logs the following errors.
Possible Solution
Allow specifying a control-port other than 80.
Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
Follow steps from here using the digital ocean provisioner.
Context
I was experimenting with implementing an azure provisioner and encountered these problems. At first I thought it was a problem with my azure setup, but then I tried with the digital ocean provisioner and encountered the same errors.
Your Environment
Reproduced using the same steps from the blog post using kind on Ubuntu 18.04.
inlets version
inlets --version
2.4.1Docker/Kubernetes version
docker version
/kubectl version
: v1.15.3Operating System and version (e.g. Linux, Windows, MacOS): Ubuntu 18.04
Link to your project or a code example to reproduce issue: reproduced on master
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: