Make restoreBlocks atomic again
#3528
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
piotr-iohk
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Looks like it fixes the issue from ADP-2211.
No failures. (~15% failures before the fix)
Finished in 2 minutes 27.7 seconds (files took 0.30509 seconds to load)
500 examples, 0 failures
|
bors r+ |
|
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request makes
restoreBlocksatomic again as making it concurrent seems to interfere with Byron addresses.This will adversely affect light-mode, but we tackle that in a separate pull request.
Issue Number
ADP-2283