You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please describe the purpose of the feature. Is it related to a problem?
Every time a hidden state is initialised with ScannedRNN.initialise_carry, a variable giving dimension for the layer width is required (sometimes this variable is called hidden_size or actor_network.pre_torso.layer_sizes[-1]). This is particularly a problem in the evaluator, where this variable cannot be consistently named between systems.
Describe the solution you'd like
When a ScannedRNN is initialised for use in a larger network, the hidden size must be recorded in such a way that it will be available whenever the hidden state must be reinitialised. I propose solutions below in order of preference:
When a ScannedRNN is used in a larger network, have that network optionally take in a hidden state. If no hidden state is provided, it will be automatically reinitialised.
Potentially, redo ScannedRNN to initialise hidden state automatically when it does not receive one specifically.
Alternatively, have an instance of the ScannedRNN live inside the greater network and have that instance retain its hidden size in a viewable way.
How do we know when implementation of this feature is complete?
Checklist:
In the evaluator and all system files, initialise_carry has access to a hidden size variable that is directly linked to the network the carry is then used for
OR initialise_carry is only ever called INSIDE the ScannedRNN or greater network (ie actor network or q learner network).
Additional context
This is a change that is too big to handle before the next deadline. It may affect all systems and their configs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please describe the purpose of the feature. Is it related to a problem?
Every time a hidden state is initialised with ScannedRNN.initialise_carry, a variable giving dimension for the layer width is required (sometimes this variable is called hidden_size or actor_network.pre_torso.layer_sizes[-1]). This is particularly a problem in the evaluator, where this variable cannot be consistently named between systems.
Describe the solution you'd like
When a ScannedRNN is initialised for use in a larger network, the hidden size must be recorded in such a way that it will be available whenever the hidden state must be reinitialised. I propose solutions below in order of preference:
How do we know when implementation of this feature is complete?
Checklist:
Additional context
This is a change that is too big to handle before the next deadline. It may affect all systems and their configs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: