You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of the accounts and connector packages is conflicted. They are implemented as separate packages. However, the accounts package is being imported into the connector package as if it were a module, when it is implemented as a standalone service.
Constraints
The connector logic and the ilp accounts logic should be separate.
They should be isolated services.
The connector service imports types from the accounts service.
The connector and accounts service should communicate in-process for performance.
Proposal
This proposal follows from #52, to be implemented alongside/after.
The connector package should be renamed the interledger package, and the accounts logic (currently in the accounts package) should be implemented as a service within the new interledger package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
The current implementation of the
accounts
andconnector
packages is conflicted. They are implemented as separate packages. However, theaccounts
package is being imported into theconnector
package as if it were a module, when it is implemented as a standalone service.Constraints
Proposal
This proposal follows from #52, to be implemented alongside/after.
The
connector
package should be renamed theinterledger
package, and the accounts logic (currently in the accounts package) should be implemented as a service within the new interledger package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: