Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Nonlinear Workload - Remove 1.0 user/sec Ramp Rate Limit per Agent #292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Nonlinear Workload - Remove 1.0 user/sec Ramp Rate Limit per Agent #292

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

Zakaria-Kofiro
Copy link
Collaborator

@Zakaria-Kofiro Zakaria-Kofiro commented Jan 5, 2024 •
edited

Nonlinear Workload - Remove 1.0 user/sec Ramp Rate Limit per Agent
Updates UI to allow entry of ramp rates above 1.0 user/sec

Please make sure these check boxes are checked before submitting

  • ** Squashed Commits **
  • ** All Tests Passed ** - mvn clean test -P default

** PR review process **

  • Requires one +1 from a reviewer
  • Repository owners will merge your PR once it is approved.

@Zakaria-Kofiro Zakaria-Kofiro marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 00:23
@Zakaria-Kofiro Zakaria-Kofiro merged commit 36b260b into master Jan 5, 2024
kevin-mcgoldrick added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
@kevin-mcgoldrick
Merge branch 'master' into jakarta2023
4aa63ad 
* master:
  update position pointer to loop subnet list (#295)
  Initialize Agents Before Starting Load (#294)
  Implement Retry for Agents Starting HttpServer (#293)
  allow any ramp rate value per agent (#292)
@Zakaria-Kofiro Zakaria-Kofiro deleted the zkofiro/update-ramp-rate branch February 29, 2024 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kevin-mcgoldrick kevin-mcgoldrick kevin-mcgoldrick approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Zakaria-Kofiro @kevin-mcgoldrick