You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does using remote A/B testing server results in loss of performance/site speed comparing to solutions where A/B testing engine is directly on web site server?
(as i understand there is a delay because we have to make calls to wasabi API hosted on different server to makes decisions about which alternatives to show to which users, and we have to wait for a response to get alternative to render the page)
Details: We have website site on php, and i am wondering if in our case it's better to use php native solution placing A/B testing engine directly on web site server.
If we decide to use wasabi what is the recommended server set-up?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Guys hi,
It's more a question than an issue.
(as i understand there is a delay because we have to make calls to wasabi API hosted on different server to makes decisions about which alternatives to show to which users, and we have to wait for a response to get alternative to render the page)
Details: We have website site on php, and i am wondering if in our case it's better to use php native solution placing A/B testing engine directly on web site server.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: