Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build fails on ARM #6

Open
hoosierEE opened this issue Jan 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Build fails on ARM #6

hoosierEE opened this issue Jan 17, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@hoosierEE
Copy link
Contributor

What I did:

  1. $ git clone https://github.com/iocane/unbox.git
  2. $ cd unbox
  3. $ tup

Many errors of the same type happen when tup gets to the file src/libj/x15.c, right before an #if SY_WIN32 section.

Here's an example of the error:

src/libj/x15.c:845:1: error: initializer element is not constant
 I static cbv[]={(I)&cb0,(I)&cb1,(I)&cb2,(I)&cb3,(I)&cb4,(I)&cb5,(I)&cb6,(I)&cb7,(I)&cb8,(I)&cb9};
 ^
src/libj/x15.c:845:1: error: (near initialization for 'cbv[0]')
src/libj/x15.c:845:25: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
 I static cbv[]={(I)&cb0,(I)&cb1,(I)&cb2,(I)&cb3,(I)&cb4,(I)&cb5,(I)&cb6,(I)&cb7,(I)&cb8,(I)&cb9};
                         ^
src/libj/x15.c:845:1: error: initializer element is not constant
 I static cbv[]={(I)&cb0,(I)&cb1,(I)&cb2,(I)&cb3,(I)&cb4,(I)&cb5,(I)&cb6,(I)&cb7,(I)&cb8,(I)&cb9};
 ^
src/libj/x15.c:845:1: error: (near initialization for 'cbv[1]')
src/libj/x15.c:845:33: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
 I static cbv[]={(I)&cb0,(I)&cb1,(I)&cb2,(I)&cb3,(I)&cb4,(I)&cb5,(I)&cb6,(I)&cb7,(I)&cb8,(I)&

Errors for cbv[2] through cbv[8] elided for brevity here. Last few lines of output:

src/libj/x15.c:857:1: error: initializer element is not constant
 I static cbvx[]={(I)&cbx0,(I)&cbx1,(I)&cbx2,(I)&cbx3,(I)&cbx4,(I)&cbx5,(I)&cbx6,(I)&cbx7,(I)&cbx8,(I)&cbx9};
 ^
src/libj/x15.c:857:1: error: (near initialization for 'cbvx[9]')
 *** tup errors ***
 *** Command ID=858 failed with return value 1
tup error: Expected to write to file 'build/x15.o' from cmd 858 but didn't
 *** Additionally, command 858 failed to process input dependencies. These should probably be fixed before addressing the command failure.
 [ETA~=7s  ]  11%
 *** tup: 1 job failed.

Here's some info about my system. For what it's worth, I use the "raspi" version of the official J804 release.

$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.8.11 #1 SMP Wed Jan 6 19:59:47 PST 2016 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
model name      : ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l)
BogoMIPS        : 48.00
Features        : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt 
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant     : 0x0
CPU part        : 0xc0f
CPU revision    : 4

processor       : 1
model name      : ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l)
BogoMIPS        : 48.00
Features        : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt 
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant     : 0x0
CPU part        : 0xc0f
CPU revision    : 4

Hardware        : SAMSUNG EXYNOS5 (Flattened Device Tree)
Revision        : 0000
Serial          : 0000000000000000
@iocane
Copy link
Owner

iocane commented Jan 19, 2016

Hi, Alex. Would you mind testing again with the develop branch. The new J source release from J Software which I merged in might fix this. Once I dig my Raspberry Pi out of the closet I'll include an arm build in my testing and add the binary to the release.

@hoosierEE
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll test the develop branch on ARM tonight. Just tested on OSX, see #8. For future reference, should I do all new-system testing on the develop branch?

@iocane
Copy link
Owner

iocane commented Jan 19, 2016

Definitely do new-system testing in the develop branch at least until the next tagged release because of the system configuration changes in js.h from the J Software release.

@hoosierEE
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested on develop, no change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants