Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Caricoos SWAN model granules need to be removed #58

Open
rsignell-usgs opened this issue Oct 3, 2014 · 10 comments
Open

Caricoos SWAN model granules need to be removed #58

rsignell-usgs opened this issue Oct 3, 2014 · 10 comments

Comments

@rsignell-usgs
Copy link
Member

@amilan17, I'm trying to eliminate all the bad DAP urls in the catalog, one group at a time. The UCAR and TAMU ones were huge!

So by perusing my list of good DAP urls and bad DAP urls it looks like next up for removal are 70+ bad Caricoos SWAN model granules like:

http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/dodsC/content/swan/201409281200.nc
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/dodsC/content/swan/201409291200.nc

We don't need these because we have the Caricoos SWAN model aggregation in the catalog and it's working nicely:

http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/dodsC/swan/SWAN_Aggregation_best.ncd

(remember to put a URL on the end if you want to try these OPeNDAP data urls in your browser)

These datasets are coming from the harvest of this top level thredds catalog:
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/catalog.html
seen here in the Collection Source:
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/docucomp/collectionSource/show/7367749?layout=fluid

@jcapella or @jrodriguez-caricoos, is it necessary to harvest this top level catalog?
If it is necessary, could you remove the SWAN folder from this top level catalog and make it a separate catalog?
I could help with that if necessary.

@amilan17
Copy link

amilan17 commented Oct 6, 2014

@rsignell-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

@amilan17, I decribe the service in question here:
#58 (comment)
we need to find out from @jcapella or @jrodriguez-caricoos if removing this catalog will have other impacts.

@jcapella
Copy link

jcapella commented Oct 6, 2014

Will get back to you as soon as I'm back at the office, tomorrow.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Rich Signell notifications@github.com
wrote:

@amilan17 https://github.com/amilan17, I decribe the service in
question here:
#58 (comment) #58 (comment)
we need to find out from @jcapella https://github.com/jcapella or
@jrodriguez-caricoos https://github.com/jrodriguez-caricoos if removing
this catalog will have other impacts.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#58 (comment).

@amilan17
Copy link

@jcapella @rsignell-usgs
any followups on whether to perform a clean up or removal of this service:
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/docucomp/collectionSource/show/7367749?layout=fluid

@rsignell-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like one of @jcapella gang has cleaned up the top level catalog
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/catalog.html
so that it points to separate catalogs now.

So definitely I would stop harvesting
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/catalog.html
and remove all the datasets that were harvested from there.

@jcapella
Copy link

We are trying to get things in order. Are we now talking ROMS or SWAN?
ROMS was depurated and only r1 remains in public view , and should be
aggregated. What's the problem with SWAN?

On 11/28/2014 8:22 AM, Rich Signell wrote:

It looks like one of @jcapella https://github.com/jcapella gang has
cleaned up the top level catalog
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/catalog.html
so that it points to separate catalogs now.

So definitely I would stop harvesting
http://dm2.caricoos.org/thredds/catalog.html
and remove all the datasets that were harvested from there.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#58 (comment).

@rsignell-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

@jcapella, the problem isn't on your end anymore -- you have cleaned things up nicely.
@amilan17 just has to clean up the metadata catalog as it still has all those SWAN daily datasets that were replaced by your SWAN aggregation.

@amilan17
Copy link

amilan17 commented Dec 1, 2014

@rsignell-usgs @jcapella
Changed status in collectionSource table to "For Removal'.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/docucomp/collectionSource/show/7367749

@amilan17
Copy link

amilan17 commented Dec 2, 2014

@rsignell-usgs @jcapella
The granules have been cleaned up. There is now only ONE record in the CariCOOS WAF.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/metadata/published/NOAA/IOOS/CariCOOS/iso/

@jcapella
Copy link

jcapella commented Dec 2, 2014

Thanks Anna and Rich.

On 12/2/2014 12:51 PM, Anna Milan
  wrote:


  @rsignell-usgs
    @jcapella 
    The granules have been cleaned up. There is now only ONE record
    in the CariCOOS WAF. 
    http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/metadata/published/NOAA/IOOS/CariCOOS/iso/
  —
    Reply to this email directly or view
      it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants