Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bibliographic data missing from OPS family response #33

Closed
amotl opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Bibliographic data missing from OPS family response #33

amotl opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@amotl
Copy link
Member

amotl commented Oct 1, 2019

Dear George,

some users and the lovely people from @Patent2net reported that family responses from OPS stopped yielding bibliographic information for some weeks already. This broke some features of Patent2Net [2] as well as PatZilla [3].

As outlined on [1], it looks like only POST requests would fail while GET requests would still succeed.

With kind regards,
Andreas.

[1] https://meta.ip-tools.org/t/bibliographic-data-missing-from-ops-family-response/161
[2] https://github.com/Patent2net/P2N-v3
[3] https://github.com/ip-tools/ip-navigator

@amotl
Copy link
Member Author

amotl commented Oct 1, 2019

@Patent2net already prepared a patch [1] but asked me to work on an official pull request. I tried to improve this beast slightly but have to admit supporting GET with the current interface will become a bit messy. However, I see it's the only way to make things work again for all users of this library.

After submitting the pull request, I will also post this issue to the EPO forum for OPS to hear what they might think about this.

Thanks already!

[1] Patent2net@1b4eb254

@amotl
Copy link
Member Author

amotl commented Oct 29, 2019

Dear George,

thank you so much for merging #34 and releasing a new version on PyPI. @Patent2net and @Quoniam will also be thankful. I hereby ask them to check if the updated version makes things work for P2N again.

With kind regards,
Andreas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant