git/versioning things

[jbenet]

• https://github.com/whyrusleeping/git-ipfs-rehost
• https://github.com/cryptix/git-remote-ipfs
• Commits in IPFS Discussion

i think we should allow putting "Discussions" here that are important, things like the above commit discussion, or the CRDTs discussion

[opn]

I'm going to be looking at and researching a version based backend for Fedwiki on IPFS over the Xmas period. So I'll be looking at using https://github.com/cryptix/git-remote-ipfs and IPNS and creating IPFS links. I've done some initial thinking about how Fedwiki structure would be ported to a global ipfs namespace. It looks surprisingly easy as there are not any url's that really need translating due tot he markup used.

I'd like to get my head better around the usage and ability to author IPFS links - any links for me to read?

[jbenet]

• The CRDTs discussion
• The commit example Versioning: Commit + Repo Datastructures notes#23
• and stay tuned for IPLD -- https://github.com/ipfs/specs/blob/ipld-spec/merkledag/ipld.md and WIP: IPLD spec specs#37

@opn what do you mean by "around the usage and ability to author IPFS links" ?

[RichardLitt]

@jbenet I agree about the Commit discussion. I'm not sure about the CRDT discussion, yet, because it doesn't seem to have had many actors and I want to make sure quality is high.

[jbenet]

That discussion is one of the most high quality discussions in the ipfs
community. But sure, it's more general anyway.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 13:56 Richard Littauer notifications@github.com
wrote:

@jbenet https://github.com/jbenet I agree about the Commit discussion.
I'm not sure about the CRDT discussion, yet, because it doesn't seem to
have had many actors and I want to make sure quality is high.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#21 (comment).

[RichardLitt]

*Edit: Switched those by accident. I meant the CRDT discussion. It's awesome, and I've added it in a PR. The commit discussion is the one that could use a bit more. :)

[RichardLitt]

Added discussions!