-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Q2 2019 OKR - Bootstrap the IPFS package manager community #29
Comments
Would it be reasonable to investigate whether there are existing channels (either ours or others') where we can reach the package manager maintainer community, rather than build a new channel and address the additional challenge of attracting traffic to it? |
Have you seen https://package.community, it’s a community chat room on discord but not easily searchable or organised into threads |
Nice! Exactly that kind of stuff. HN, Reddit, etc etc? |
There's also a package management subreddit that I started last year, pretty quiet though: https://www.reddit.com/r/packagemanagement/ |
Added a row for "existing communications channels" to the top-level package manager audience analysis Mural here (it's at the bottom): |
@jessicaschilling good list, one change might be to list "source repos" rather than "github repos" so as not to exclude gitlab, bitbucket, sourcehut that are also used for similar purposes as GitHub and can be channels of communication. |
@jessicaschilling another channel is "mailing list" which both package managers and individual packages have, could be grouped in with forums but didn't want it to get left out. |
@andrew - Thanks for catching my github-specific blinders 😄 As for mailing lists vs forums ... good call. Functionally speaking they should probably be separate for purposes of this diagram simply because even if mailing lists might be intended to be used as means for two-way conversation, in practice they tend to be much more of a broadcast medium than forums/discussion boards. Changed the board accordingly. Thanks! |
Create a place package manager maintainers can hang out in to talk about and get help with using IPFS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: