Execution count after SyntaxError #1070
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… count where we would normally. Closes ipythongh-633
|
Didn't last long without an open PR, heh? :) I'll have a look later today, thanks. |
|
Sensible, straightforward, merged. |
mattvonrocketstein
pushed a commit
to mattvonrocketstein/ipython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2014
… count where we would normally. Closes ipythongh-633 closes ipythongh-1070
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After a SyntaxError in code run by run_cell, only increment execution count where we would normally (i.e. if store_history is True).
Trivial change, but it's right in our core machinery, so I thought I'd let someone else have a quick look.
Closes gh-633