Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What can be better next year? #67

Open
tommeagher opened this issue Mar 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

What can be better next year? #67

tommeagher opened this issue Mar 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@tommeagher
Copy link
Collaborator

What worked well this time? What could've gone better? What missed the mark? Is there anything we could've used more of or less of?

Any and all feedback and ideas are welcome.

@elainewong, @meli-lewis, @chrislkeller, @aboutaaron, @zufanka, @robroc, @esagara, @thejqs?

Any PyCAR students have advice or reactions?

@robroc
Copy link
Collaborator

robroc commented Mar 22, 2019

One quick thought: we could update the HTML table used in the scraping portion. That 2015 table hosted on S3 is looking pretty dated.

@tommeagher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@robroc, this is a good idea. I think we can fairly easily freshen that data with more recent films from the same source.

@thejqs
Copy link
Collaborator

thejqs commented Mar 28, 2019

Little bit of feedback I got was that we spent a lot of time explaining at the expense of helping them build up some muscle memory. (I'm paraphrasing.)

Almost all of us have helped with PyCAR more than once, and I found myself wondering, too, whether I spent too much energy anticipating problems and trying to pre-explain them out of existence instead of letting things happen more as learning-by-doing moments. It felt like they raised their hands for help less this year and that that might be a byproduct of less typing.

I'd be interested to hear what y'all thought about that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants