LIcence is always valid

[PallHaraldsson]

Not "until" something:

9694ba9

[PallHaraldsson]

I'm not sure this is the best text, it needs not refer to the year at all?

[irgolic]

Hey, sorry for the late response. To be crystal clear, the license is always valid. What you're reading is GPT's interpretation of the MIT license. The part you're editing is autogenerated, and the change would be reverted in its next run.

Thanks for pointing it out, interesting to see gpt-3.5-turbo get something like this wrong!

[PallHaraldsson]

Interesting, what is the prompt? I assume the LICENSE.md file, in full, not just "MIT license" but but something more, prefix "explain the following file" that you do for any file?

[irgolic]

If you'd like to see the exact prompts, try running it with verbose: true. It'll then show you all the steps of the process in the PR.

So your trigger file should look something like this:

triggers:
  - label_substring: summarize
    on_issue: false
    on_pull_request: true
    run: summarize_pr
    verbose: true