Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the helm templates to support Control Plane SDS (#16466) #16533

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Aug 25, 2019

Conversation

JimmyCYJ
Copy link
Member

@JimmyCYJ JimmyCYJ commented Aug 24, 2019

  • support control plane SDS
  • test control plane SDS
  • set env
  • template change for SDS control plane
  • enable control plane SDS

Please provide a description for what this PR is for.

And to help us figure out who should review this PR, please
put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.

[ ] Configuration Infrastructure
[ ] Docs
[ ] Installation
[ ] Networking
[ ] Performance and Scalability
[ ] Policies and Telemetry
[ ] Security
[ ] Test and Release
[ ] User Experience
[ ] Developer Infrastructure

* support control plane SDS

* test control plane SDS

* revise

* revise

* revise

* set env

* revise

* revise

* revise

* revise

* revise

* revise

* template change for SDS control plane

* revise

* update

* fix unit tests

* fix tests

* enable control plane SDS
@JimmyCYJ JimmyCYJ requested a review from a team August 24, 2019 04:37
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. label Aug 24, 2019
@istio-testing istio-testing added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 24, 2019
@JimmyCYJ
Copy link
Member Author

manually create a PR that cherry-picks #16466

@JimmyCYJ
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @myidpt

@myidpt
Copy link
Contributor

myidpt commented Aug 24, 2019

@rlenglet
The auto-cherrypick failed: #16466

@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ spec:
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: metadata.namespace
- name: SDS_ENABLED
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JimmyCYJ Please update this PR's description to link to the equivalent PR that updates the new installer. If you won't update the new installer, please explain why.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@myidpt Could you provide any context about equivalent changes to new installer?

@rlenglet
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@JimmyCYJ
Copy link
Member Author

The unit tests fail because #16462 is cherry-picked into 1.3 branch, which changes auth_golden.json and running_golden.json. I have to update authsds_golden.json and runningsds_golden.json accordingly.

@istio-testing
Copy link
Collaborator

istio-testing commented Aug 25, 2019

@JimmyCYJ: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
integ-new-install-k8s-presubmit-tests-release-1.3 b5cde27 link /test integ-new-install-k8s-presubmit-tests-release-1.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@istio-testing istio-testing merged commit 7f65e3e into istio:release-1.3 Aug 25, 2019
@JimmyCYJ JimmyCYJ deleted the release-1.3 branch August 25, 2019 03:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants