Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strange routing using contracted #196

Open
alecava58 opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Strange routing using contracted #196

alecava58 opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@alecava58
Copy link

alecava58 commented Jun 6, 2018

Hi Ben,

I'm reporting a strange routing using contracted classifications graph. See the following pictures and the corresponding attached geojson file.

Not contracted
image

Contracted
image

appo.zip

@xivk xivk self-assigned this Jun 6, 2018
@xivk xivk added the bug label Jun 6, 2018
@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jun 6, 2018

Thanks for reporting, can you tell me:

  • Version of Itinero used.
  • Area or source file.
  • Profile used (assuming car.classifications (?))

@alecava58
Copy link
Author

I saw this strange route with the version 1.4.0pre something, just to be sure I updated to 1.4.0pre60.
The source file is Italy.osm.pbf from geofabrik I think from a couple month ago.
Profile is car.classifications. I did a lot of test before reporting but if I remenber well car.fastest didn't have the problem.

Tell me if you need more informations.

Thanks in advance.

@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jun 6, 2018

Anything you can give me, source/destination coordinates for example. I'll try and have a look soon...

@alecava58
Copy link
Author

alecava58 commented Jun 6, 2018 via email

@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jun 6, 2018

Ah no that's enough thanks, sorry... 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants