apply-lens is a bad name

[jackfirth]

Lenses aren't really supposed to be interpreted as functions any more outside of applicable lenses. Non exhaustive list of possible better names:

• lens-view/context
• lens-view+context
• focus-lens
• lens-values

[AlexKnauth]

For consistency, since lens-view, lens-set, and lens-transform all begin with lens, should focus-lens and let-lens begin with lens too, making them lens-focus and lens-let? (you could keep let-lens as an alias for backwards-compatability) Or is there a better way to name them consistently? (lens-focus seems wrong somehow?)

[jackfirth]

focus-lens definitely should be lens-focus for consistency, and that sounds alright to me. Could you elaborate on the "seems wrong" part? let-lens probably shouldn't for backwards compatibility, though that should be filed away into a list of changes that we want to make if we ever make a lens2 package.

[AlexKnauth]

I'm not sure. Coming back to it it doesn't seem as wrong though. I don't know.