-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate scalar transport - [merged] #134
Comments
In GitLab by @oliveroxtoby on May 10, 2022, 21:21 requested review from @icojb25 |
In GitLab by @icojb25 on May 11, 2022, 24:57 Thanks for the fix to the field name.
Agreed - I hadn't noticed, but we should do that.
Fair enough, I'll add it back. It would be nice if it was a dropdown of valid phase names like we have in the init fields dialog (for example) rather than free-form text.
Good point. Maybe caveat emptor for now, but it would be good if we had a more formal list we can query of which solvers and turbulence models use which fields. Something like a dictionary with information for each solver name (e.g. whether it uses kinematic or dynamic pressure, which fields it involves, etc.) would make the code cleaner.
It's this feature of the template builder - also used for giving the alpha fields the correct name: https://gitlab.com/opensimproject/cfdof/-/blob/develop/data/defaults/_Readme.md#L59 |
In GitLab by @oliveroxtoby on May 11, 2022, 21:07 added 1 commit
|
In GitLab by @icojb25 on May 12, 2022, 01:13 Nice addition to the workbench @oliveroxtoby 👍 |
In GitLab by @oliveroxtoby on May 10, 2022, 21:21
Merges integrate-scalarTransport -> develop
Hi Jon
Are you ok with these changes to scalar transport?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: