Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Multiple network profiles for models (API) #3404

Closed
1 task
eckartal opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task

feat: Multiple network profiles for models (API) #3404

eckartal opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@eckartal
Copy link
Contributor

  • I have searched the existing issues

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe it

Currently, the OpenAI model configuration only accepts one URL, but users like me often switch between multiple OpenAPI URLs depending on the use case. Manually editing the URL each time is time-consuming and inefficient.

Describe the solution

A feature that allows users to create and manage multiple network profiles for different models.

Teachability, documentation, adoption, migration strategy

No response

What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?

It'd be perfect for users who rely on multiple backends for different tasks.

@eckartal eckartal added the type: feature request A new feature label Aug 19, 2024
@eckartal eckartal changed the title feat: Multiple network profiles for models feat: Multiple network profiles for models (API) Aug 19, 2024
@imtuyethan imtuyethan self-assigned this Aug 19, 2024
@imtuyethan imtuyethan removed their assignment Aug 28, 2024
@jens-ghc
Copy link

jens-ghc commented Aug 31, 2024

Linking this up to my related issue: #3214

@0xSage
Copy link
Contributor

0xSage commented Sep 5, 2024

dupe of 3214, which explains better

@0xSage 0xSage closed this as completed Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants