-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
phenomnomnominal #13
Comments
👍 I think that if Craig is still interested we should RO him again. Except for that isolated incident he's been helpful and constructive for many years and is active in a time zone not many other ROs are active in. |
+1, think he should be RO'd again. |
👍 |
+1 add him back. |
+1 |
1 similar comment
👍 |
No objections. +1 |
👍 |
2 similar comments
👍 |
👍 |
HOW DO YOU +1 THUMB |
👍 |
👍 |
1 similar comment
👍 |
Honestly I'm sick of having to tell him what deleted messages are, so another 👍 from me. |
Chop chop done waiting, I am adding him |
It's telling me he is already an owner but he isn't. |
👍 Even if he is a filthy Kiwi, he's our filthy Kiwi. |
closing, cause you all love me and it's done. |
http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/17/conversation/phenomnomnominal-kicked-towc We may want to remind @phenomnomnominal not to play around with those kicks. |
@phenomnomnominal - stahp |
Yes yes. |
I think this can be closed. @phenomnomnominal has been good with his powers overall since his return to RO that I've seen and we're past the 72 hour mark. |
I'm amazing. |
FUCK, we clicked the button at the same time. |
clearly I got there first. :D |
Context: #6
This is a thread to discuss whether or not we should re-add phenomnomnominal as a room owner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: