Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shrek for Room Owner #42

Closed
darkyen opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 27 comments
Closed

Shrek for Room Owner #42

darkyen opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 27 comments

Comments

@darkyen
Copy link
Member

darkyen commented Jun 29, 2017

I'd like to self-nominate myself. I know I had been stupid in past and I have since then matured a lot and am usually active in the JS Room. I believe I should be a room owner again.

@michaelrwiley
Copy link

michaelrwiley commented Jun 29, 2017

I'm kind of an outside observer, but this Vap0r guy is doing good things for the community, maybe look into him for Room Owner?

EDIT: you guys realize that Emoji's hurt right? Who ever this Vap0r guy is he might be crying right now

@ssube
Copy link

ssube commented Jun 29, 2017

I was under the impression Shrek stopped being RO just due to inactivity. Was there something I missed?

@Trasiva
Copy link

Trasiva commented Jun 29, 2017

I'd be okay with Shrek as an RO again. I think perhaps a probationary period of say...one month would suffice. Provided that he remains active.

@ndugger
Copy link

ndugger commented Jun 29, 2017

Stop trying to take advantage of my removal, you bully 😢

@darkyen
Copy link
Member Author

darkyen commented Jun 29, 2017

I am active, I just don't talk much 😄, I keep an eye on the chat though.

@luggage66
Copy link
Member

I have no objection but his active period, according to SO, is inline with most of us and we have that time period pretty well covered. That may not be accurate if the other time zones just aren't well represented. Is this a vote or a conversation?

@darkyen
Copy link
Member Author

darkyen commented Jun 29, 2017

I do work in US Timezones, yes. But I thought there wasn't a top-limit on ROs?

@ssube
Copy link

ssube commented Jun 29, 2017

There isn't a strict limit, but we don't want all ROs. It's never good for chat rooms and makes getting a majority vote difficult.

@kendfrey
Copy link
Contributor

There doesn't seem to be much support for this. No action needed.

@benjamingr benjamingr reopened this Jul 19, 2017
@benjamingr
Copy link
Contributor

@kendfrey by our rules - he won:

Changes to room ownership shall be proposed via an issue on this repository. RO proposals will have 72 hours for voting, after which the proposal will be acted on if 50% or more of standing votes are in favour.

However, it wasn't pinned. Would you be fine with voting on this after pinning in the room for 3 days @kendfrey ?

@andkhong
Copy link

hi

@luggage66
Copy link
Member

luggage66 commented Jul 19, 2017

I thought votes were started when one of us nominated, not when someone nominates themselves, we talk about maybe starting a vote for a while, then count the votes later when we didn't even know it was a vote.

To quote myself: Is this a vote or a conversation?

@luggage66
Copy link
Member

In other words, we have enough thumbs up to consider it a nomination, then we should start an actual vote.

@benjamingr
Copy link
Contributor

@luggage66 when we had room meetings to discuss this a long while ago we decided to let anyone nominate themselves. That policy isn't set in stone and we can vote on it.

In case whoever nominated the RO is an issue - I would like to nominate @darkyen for room owner so he has someone "on the inside" as a nominator.

@xbenjii
Copy link

xbenjii commented Jul 19, 2017

Definitely more active now, what was the reason for dropping RO before?

@Trasiva
Copy link

Trasiva commented Jul 19, 2017

He wasn't around. Busy with other stuff at the time.

@xbenjii
Copy link

xbenjii commented Jul 19, 2017

Also echoing what @ssube said, how many is too many?

@luggage66
Copy link
Member

According to #14 there is no hard limit. Wether your vote based on that is up to you, of course.

@RUJodan
Copy link

RUJodan commented Jul 19, 2017

+1 vote

@monners
Copy link

monners commented Jul 19, 2017

Oh, Darkyen! +1 for sure.

@wibily
Copy link

wibily commented Jul 20, 2017

+1

@loktar00
Copy link

+1 because Darkyen is my homie.

@ssube
Copy link

ssube commented Jul 20, 2017

+1 aye

I thought we had already voted, so this is all very surprising. 😲

@Canop
Copy link

Canop commented Jul 21, 2017

+1

@xbenjii
Copy link

xbenjii commented Jul 21, 2017

Added as RO, it's pretty clear what the outcome is. I know the procedure is 72 hours but this has been open a while and nobody has any problems.

Also can someone close this, because I don't have permission to :)

@benjamingr
Copy link
Contributor

@Zirak ^ can you please add Ben to the org?

@Zirak
Copy link

Zirak commented Aug 3, 2017

@benjamingr Doooooooooooooone!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests