Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submit 2.0 to PyPI #9

Open
JohnDoee opened this issue Apr 9, 2013 · 24 comments
Open

Submit 2.0 to PyPI #9

JohnDoee opened this issue Apr 9, 2013 · 24 comments

Comments

@JohnDoee
Copy link

JohnDoee commented Apr 9, 2013

Can you submit 2.0 to PyPI ? seems like 1.1 is the latest: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pybloom

@jaybaird
Copy link
Owner

I'll try to get to this this week. It was submitted to PyPI under an email I no longer have control of, so it may take me a while.

@bgilbert
Copy link

Any news on this? It's sort of painful to have to use dependency_links in setup.py to declare a dependency on current pybloom, and pip 1.6 is apparently going to drop support for dependency_links altogether.

@Bachmann1234
Copy link
Contributor

@jaybaird i'd be down for an update on this a well. I am interested in putting some work into this library if you are still able to maintain it.

@JohnDoee
Copy link
Author

I think someone needs to take the baton, try and get in touch with @jaybaird and take over management of the project (PyPi stuff etc). It would be sad to see it die just because the current owner lost interest / time / whatever.

Judging by his twitter, he isn't internet-dead.

@Bachmann1234
Copy link
Contributor

hmmm, ill reach out

@Bachmann1234
Copy link
Contributor

@JohnDoee just sent @jaybaird an email offering to adopt this project.

@jaybaird
Copy link
Owner

Nope, not dead, just working at Apple :)

The PyPI thing is hard because I have no way of getting control of that package since it was submitted under my old work email. If you folks know of a way to get control of that again I'm all ears so I can submit.

@JohnDoee
Copy link
Author

Good to see you alive and kicking :)

You can get your email changed by submitting a ticket here: http://sourceforge.net/p/pypi/support-requests/ at least, that's what other folks did.

@jaybaird
Copy link
Owner

Awesome, thanks mate. I'll get that in right now.

@bgilbert
Copy link

@jaybaird Any luck? For some reason, I'm not seeing your ticket on the PyPI support board.

@jaybaird
Copy link
Owner

I had a busy weekend and had to get my SourceForge credentials back up to date as well. It’s on my to do list this week though.

Jay

On Jun 16, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Benjamin Gilbert notifications@github.com wrote:

@jaybaird Any luck? For some reason, I'm not seeing your ticket on the PyPI support board.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@Bachmann1234
Copy link
Contributor

@jaybaird any update? Anything we can do to help?

@hosford42
Copy link

@jaybaird Any word on this? I'm having the same issue... If there is no way to get access to the original account, could you republish under a new package name?

@jhgg
Copy link

jhgg commented Jun 15, 2015

+1

@mdshw5
Copy link

mdshw5 commented Jul 29, 2015

Yes, maybe this can be resubmitted under a new name? It's kind of silly that the PyPI version is so far behind the current master...

@JohnDoee
Copy link
Author

JohnDoee commented Aug 3, 2015

Another issue is that it seems like jaybaird isn't very active here anymore.

My solution is that we should move it all to a fork and run the project there.

I elect myself to do all this, not because I'm the best choice but because someone has to put up their hand to get things moving.

Feel free to volunteer yourself to handle it or throw in some critique / comments. I'll give it a few weeks and just do it if nothing new appears.

@hosford42
Copy link

I considered doing that myself, but I didn't know if it would be polite. I am for it as well, if we don't get a response from him in that time frame. (It has been over a year since he was last seen here, after all.) If you need any assistance packaging, testing, or posting it, let me know.

@jhgg
Copy link

jhgg commented Aug 3, 2015

Honestly, if you are going to fork this, I'd recommend redoing the hash stuff too. Using cryptographically secure hashes in a bloomfilter is pointless & slows things down. Should be using murmur3 hash instead.

@jhgg
Copy link

jhgg commented Aug 3, 2015

I wrote https://github.com/jhgg/pybloof using the faster hashing algorithm. But I think it needs some review & API improvements.

@bgilbert
Copy link

bgilbert commented Aug 4, 2015

PyPI's draft transfer policy allows PyPI packages to be transferred by a PyPI admin with permission from the current owner. If @jaybaird would be willing to give his permission, development could continue under the current PyPI package name (and presumably a different GitHub account). If not, I think forking makes sense.

@RazerM
Copy link

RazerM commented Oct 21, 2015

I think I'll be submitting this to PyPI with a slightly different name, if only because I can't find any other implementations of a bloom filter that support Python 3 and/or Windows (which I plan on building wheels for using AppVeyor).

I'd also be happy to conribute the AppVeyor stuff if someone else would prefer to fork (@JohnDoee, @hosford42)

Edit: I looked at so many different bloom filters I forgot this one is pure Python, only need to upload...

@nirizr
Copy link

nirizr commented Jun 30, 2016

Looks like this fork is trying to reanimate this module

@joseph-fox
Copy link

joseph-fox commented Jun 30, 2016

@nirizr Yes, I have been trying my best to keep the forked repository active.

It is available in pypi.

@nirizr
Copy link

nirizr commented Jun 30, 2016

Yep. Just wanted to make it more visible :)

groovecoder pushed a commit to groovecoder/python-bloomfilter that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants