You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the lpar17 benchmark suite (and jayhorn-set), the SatHanoi.java test case appears to actually be unsafe. The comment states // result and the counter should be the same! but the program asserts false if the values are equal (UnsatHanoi appears to assert equality correctly). Removing the call to Random.nextInt and replacing it with a value in the range [1,31] confirms that SatHanoi indeed hits an assertion failure, and is therefore unsafe (similarly, UnsatHanoi does not appear to throw an exception). Am I misinterpreting the Sat/Unsat labels here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the lpar17 benchmark suite (and jayhorn-set), the
SatHanoi.java
test case appears to actually be unsafe. The comment states// result and the counter should be the same!
but the program asserts false if the values are equal (UnsatHanoi
appears to assert equality correctly). Removing the call toRandom.nextInt
and replacing it with a value in the range[1,31]
confirms thatSatHanoi
indeed hits an assertion failure, and is therefore unsafe (similarly,UnsatHanoi
does not appear to throw an exception). Am I misinterpreting the Sat/Unsat labels here?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: