[JBTM-2679] narayna-full to contain bits of jbossxts

[ochaloup]

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2679

!QA_JTA !QA_JTS_JDKORB !BLACKTIE !PERF !MAIN

[jbosstm-bot]

Started testing this pull request with XTS profile: http://albany.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana-jdk8/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/1510/

[jbosstm-bot]

XTS profile tests failed (http://albany.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana-jdk8/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/1510/): compensations build failed

[tomjenkinson]

The failure was caused by:
consoleText.zip

[ochaloup]

hm... I'm a bit lost here. What influence could have change in narayana-full for compensations module?

I've rerun the compilation and the tests on my machine and I can't see the reffered exception.
My investigation on the stack trace was not much informative either. The error which seems caused the test failure is com.arjuna.wst.SystemException: com.arjuna.wsc.InvalidStateException: ARJUNA042083: Invalid coordination context state. Some kind of test instability?

I would like to left this being retested and then would see.

[ochaloup]

retest this please

[tomjenkinson]

it could be because compensations may have a dependency on XTS: @gytis do you have any suggestion?

[jbosstm-bot]

Started testing this pull request with XTS profile: http://albany.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana-jdk8/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/1515/

[ochaloup]

I see. Just I thought that narayna-full is a module independent on other modules. It's built as last one and means like "create a distro".

[jbosstm-bot]

XTS profile tests failed (http://albany.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana-jdk8/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/1515/): compensations build failed

[tomjenkinson]

ah, I think this is because we can't test XTS on 5.2 branch now (we can build it) - please can I ask you to raise this on master instead of 5.2 then we can just backport it. I think we need a JBTM-2679 for the backport unless 7.1 is fine.

[ochaloup]

Sure, I've created PR #1017 that targets master. I hope I'll be more lucky with the new one ;)

[ochaloup]

Test for this change passed on master branch (see #1017)

[tomjenkinson]

Great - do you need a JBEAP as this is 5.2 branch?

[ochaloup]

Nope, from my point this small change is perfectly fine without JBEAP. But depends. I don't know if this would not break productization process or something if there is not JBEAP.

For me this is fine as JBTM.