Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: use split pane stand-alone #32

Closed
c-alpha opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Feature request: use split pane stand-alone #32

c-alpha opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@c-alpha
Copy link

c-alpha commented Dec 22, 2021

I'd like to be able to use the split pane feature only, i.e. without the powerline-based header or any other eye candy, please.

@jeetelongname
Copy link
Owner

Hi! I would not mind a PR for this, I am currently trying to update and modularise elfeed-goodies so its easier to extend and remove, its just been a little slow going with life and all that.

@jeetelongname
Copy link
Owner

If you do want to do this then do not call elfeed-goodies/setup and just add

  (setq elfeed-show-entry-switch #'elfeed-goodies/switch-pane
        elfeed-show-entry-delete #'elfeed-goodies/delete-pane
        elfeed-show-refresh-function #'elfeed-goodies/show-refresh--plain)

  (define-key elfeed-show-mode-map "n" #'elfeed-goodies/split-show-next)
  (define-key elfeed-show-mode-map "p" #'elfeed-goodies/split-show-prev)

which should in theory be all that is needed to just use that. setup is a set of defaults but you should be able to use as little or as much as you want if you just configure it yourself :)

which should only rebind those keys

@c-alpha
Copy link
Author

c-alpha commented Jun 14, 2022

Thanks for the hint! 😄

@Thaodan
Copy link

Thaodan commented Nov 14, 2022

which should in theory be all that is needed to just use that. setup is a set of defaults but you should be able to use as little or as much as you want if you just configure it yourself :)

It might be handy if powerline would be an optional dependency for such cases.

@jeetelongname
Copy link
Owner

the setup function was always a set of opinionated defaults. You can take as much of this package. I think a new issue / PR for this is warranted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants