Add tags to JSON metadata #151

aav7fl · 2017-01-16T22:35:37Z

Add Feature
Add Docs
Add Tests

This is just to add in the Author field (which is helpful for blog posts/articles when searching for articles + rich text formatting from Google).

This also allows the Google Structured Data Testing Tool to pass without any errors for the type BlogPosting (now there are only warnings).

BlogPosting was chosen instead of WebSite because of Google will treat this content type differently when it displays Rich Cards.

Fixes missing author and name in blogPosting types with organization.

pathawks · 2017-01-16T22:46:31Z

lib/template.html

@@ -221,6 +228,9 @@
 {% if seo_site_logo %}
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
+        {% if seo_author_name %}
+            "Name": {{ seo_author_name | jsonify }},


Shouldn't this be name?

Yes. It should. I'll change that shortly.

pathawks · 2017-01-16T22:48:32Z

Does this fix #96?

/cc: @renshuki

aav7fl

Changed casing.

aav7fl · 2017-01-16T23:02:15Z

It does not fix #96. I can get around to that soon. It's something I would like to add as well. This only adds the proper JSON tags to pass the errors (but not the warnings).

pathawks · 2017-01-16T23:14:49Z

I can get around to that soon. It's something I would like to add as well.

I was just curious. We've got a PR for that in #103 👍

This adds the rest of the JSON fields to pass all errors and blog postings. - Adds page.image.url for the image url. (Will default to image if not present). - Add page.image.height and page.image.width for an image object (Will default back to image url if not present). - Add dateModified (will capture from yaml if present, if not it will use datePublished) - (I feel there should be a manual option for this as I sometimes save parts of my blog that shouldn't update the modified field, but still change the file timestamp). This should create JSON that will pass all warnings/strong recommendations/errors from [Google's Structured Data Testing Tool](https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool).

aav7fl

Proposing a few changes following the already present code styling. I would love to have these feature implemented as they clear all warnings/errors in the JSON; leaving it properly formatted.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:41:10Z

lib/template.html

@@ -89,7 +92,7 @@
 {% endif %}

 {% if page.image %}
-  {% assign seo_page_image = page.image.path | default: page.image.facebook | default: page.image %}
+  {% assign seo_page_image = page.image.path | default: page.image.url | default: page.image.facebook | default: page.image %}


Allow for page.image.url here, else there will be a mess of if interpreting the yaml object when it encounters this unknown yaml field.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:41:37Z

lib/template.html

@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
    {% endif %}
  {% endif %}
  {% assign seo_author_twitter = seo_author_twitter | replace:"@","" %}
+  {% if seo_author.name %}
+    {% assign seo_author_name = seo_author.name %}
+  {% endif %}


Add Author Name

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:41:51Z

lib/template.html

+{% if seo_author_name %}
+    "author": {{ seo_author_name | jsonify }},
+{% endif %}
+


Add Author Name

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:43:31Z

lib/template.html

+      },
+    {% else %}
+        "image": {{ seo_page_image | jsonify }},
+    {% endif %}


Create image object (as it needs). Height and width are probably required now for some future thinking. Think AMP where they require this information in the markup.

Will default back if either no width/height are present, or if no image url is present.

For a future iteration, it'd be great if we could calculate the height and width for local images (assuming we can do so safely without adding something like imagemagic).

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:44:21Z

lib/template.html

+{% elseif page.date %}
+    "dateModified": {{ page.date | date_to_xmlschema | jsonify }},
+{% endif %}
+


Add a date modified field. Useful when wanting to control this manually. Like when I make a change to the markup file, but I want to override the timestamp given.

Will default to page.date if never "modified". Will not exist if neither field present.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:45:09Z

lib/template.html

 {% if seo_description %}
    "description": {{ seo_description | jsonify }},
 {% endif %}

 {% if seo_site_logo %}
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
+        {% if seo_author_name %}
+            "name": {{ seo_author_name | jsonify }},
+        {% endif %}


Add Author Name.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:46:39Z

lib/template.html

+         "@id": {{ page.url | replace:'/index.html','/' | absolute_url | jsonify }}
+    },
+{% endif %}
+


Add mainEntityOfPage when BlogPosting type is chosen.
Better explained in this StackOverflow post.

I tried read that post 6 six times, studied Schema.org and still couldn't understand this until I saw your example. 😂 Given Schema.org says all webpages are implicitly of Type WebPage (if not defined) this makes sense. Given this tag also applies to "CreativeWork", it would be useful to add that here while we're making this change as it will help with Structured Data validation for that common type.

Thanks! I've added this to my local branch, along with a test.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T14:48:48Z

Whoops. Wrong language. Left an 'e' in my elsif.
Fixed.

Well.... looks like I added an 'e'. Whoops.

aav7fl

Removed a silly letter ('e').

Adds documentation on new image behavior, dateModified, and author field.

aav7fl · 2017-01-17T16:22:59Z

Added updated documentation for changes. Working on tests next. Also noticed a small change I needed to make. It will be in a new pull eventually.

aav7fl · 2017-01-18T20:32:07Z

This makes changes to the JSON-LD information. Fixes warning/errors reported by Google Structured Data Testing Tool.

Travis didn't like my date/dateModified tests because of time-zone issues. I had to pull those specific ones. Fixed up the rubocop styling.

Looks like everything is good for an inspection.

…e test coverage

…ing style.

aav7fl · 2017-01-25T16:41:29Z

lib/template.html

+{% if seo_author %}
+  <meta name="author" content="{{ seo_author }}" />
+{% endif %}
+


Added in content of PR #103 along with tests (because it made sense to add the author meta field when I was already doing it in the JSON).

I am still 👎 on this with out a clear use case

meta author is not recognized by Google (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/79812?hl=en) et was deprecated in favor of Rich Snippets. What is the intent in adding this if it is ignored by search engines?

Well it's ignored by Google but not by Facebook. The purpose of this change is to show up the author name of an article when you share it on Facebook. If the meta name="author" is not set the author name will not be displayed when you share a jekyll blog article on Facebook (Issue #96). If the author of the article has a Facebook account you can use the meta property="article:author" which his ID / profile URL instead but it's not always the case.

If someone have any other suggestion to resolve this problem it would be greatly appreciated 😃

aav7fl

Write explanations for code changes.

pathawks · 2017-01-25T17:01:13Z

lib/template.html

+{% if seo_author %}
+  <meta name="author" content="{{ seo_author }}" />
+{% endif %}
+


I am still 👎 on this with out a clear use case

aav7fl · 2017-01-25T17:19:49Z

Ok. Yea. I guess I'm stuck in the past. I can't find any good documentation that clearly states that it is used anymore. Even for markup. Most places with use JSON-LD or OG tags. Removing author meta tag & test.

aav7fl · 2017-04-03T17:48:50Z

@benbalter @jhabdas Removed image changes from this PR. #174 is handling image changes. Should be more straight forward if it's ok having these changes in a single PR. If not, I can continue pulling these out, but they seem to go together.

Additions in this PR exist to appease Google Structured Data Testing Tool.

ghost · 2017-04-03T18:02:44Z

README.md

@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ The SEO tag will respect any of the following if included in your site's `_confi
 * `social` - For [specifying social profiles](https://developers.google.com/structured-data/customize/social-profiles). The following properties are available:
  * `name` - If the user or organization name differs from the site's name
  * `links` - An array of links to social media profiles.
+  * `date_modified` - (YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm) A manual override for the `dateModified` field in the JSON-LD output. This field will take **first priority** for the `dateModified` output. This is useful when the file timestamp does not match the true time that the content was modified.


For clarity, I feel we should mention what's being overridden. Also, given Jekyll supports use of ISO 8601 dates, perhaps it's best if we left any formatting out of the example so as not to lead implementations (which might otherwise choose to include the Timezone offset). Also, and now I'm being persnickety, it would be great if this and the next bullet could be condensed into one.

How about this:

date_modified - Manually specify the dateModified field in the JSON-LD output to override Jekyll's own dateModified. This field will take first priority for the dateModified JSON-LD output. This is useful when the file timestamp does not match the true time that the content was modified. A user may also install Last Modified At which will offer an alternative way of providing for the dateModified field.

ghost · 2017-04-03T18:06:39Z

spec/jekyll_seo_tag_spec.rb

@@ -237,11 +237,49 @@
    end

    context "with absolute site.logo" do
-      let(:site) { make_site("logo" => "http://cdn.example.invalid/logo.png", "url" => "http://example.invalid") }
+      let(:site) { make_site("logo" => "http://cdn.example.invalid/logo.png", "url" => "http://example.invalid", "author" => "Mr. Foo") }


Feels like this should be broken into a different context so we're not conflating test logic between existing and new features. Does that make sense?

I guess. But it feels like there are unnecessary LOC when the actual test is given with context in line 246.

Mostly because I remember a talk about refactoring to shrink things down; wondered if this would be part of that example.

I'll defer this one. I don't have the experience with tests to make a good judgement here. Just wafting around code smell. 💨

Maybe we'll save it for when we refactor the tests to bring our coverage back up.

I don't think I understand the connection between author and logo.
If we're adding something new, we should add new tests, not modify existing tests.

ghost · 2017-04-03T18:12:06Z

This is looking great! Much easier to grok now. Just one small question/comment about the test logic and I'm a personally.

aav7fl · 2017-04-03T18:29:46Z

Alright. It should be ready now.

pathawks

I’ve requested a few clarifications.

Overall, I’m excited for this and think it will improve our plugin 👍

pathawks · 2017-04-03T18:22:18Z

spec/jekyll_seo_tag_spec.rb

@@ -237,11 +237,49 @@
    end

    context "with absolute site.logo" do
-      let(:site) { make_site("logo" => "http://cdn.example.invalid/logo.png", "url" => "http://example.invalid") }
+      let(:site) { make_site("logo" => "http://cdn.example.invalid/logo.png", "url" => "http://example.invalid", "author" => "Mr. Foo") }


I don't think I understand the connection between author and logo.
If we're adding something new, we should add new tests, not modify existing tests.

pathawks · 2017-04-03T18:23:19Z

spec/jekyll_seo_tag_spec.rb

+    end
+
+    context "with page author" do
+      let(:site) { make_site("logo" => "/logo.png", "url" => "http://example.invalid") }


Is this necessary here? Context is "with page author" says nothing about logo.

Sure. The lovely Google Structured Data Testing Tool complains when the publisher object (required to pass..) does not have a name. For the purposes of a blog (What Jekyll is), the name is the author.

http://i.imgur.com/xnu0JG7.png

Sorry, I was referring to the logo bits. Is that necessary here?

Kind of. I think I understand what you are asking;

If I have the publisher object

"publisher": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Kyle Niewiada", "logo": {"@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://www.kyleniewiada.org/assets/img/logo.png"}},

I need to have both logo and author together. If I remove just the author, it's an error. If I remove just the logo, it's an error. So they need to be both implemented together. That means when I make the site in the test, I need the logo and the author together.

pathawks · 2017-04-03T18:28:02Z

lib/template.html

@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@
  {% assign seo_author_twitter = seo_author_twitter | replace:"@","" %}
 {% endif %}

+{% if page.date_modified or page.last_modified_at or page.date %}
+  {% assign seo_date_modified = page.seo.date_modified | default: page.last_modified_at | default: page.date %}


I don't know if we want to set seo_date_modified at all if all we have is page.date. What is the motivation?

Google will complain if there is no "dateModified", even if it is the exact same.

The dateModified field is recommended. Please provide a value if available.

It would seem that if date_modified or similar is not set, we do not have a value available.

I would hope so, but the warning from their tool gives no indication if missing this field is a 'include it if you use it, ignore it if you don't", I can leave it out. But I wanted to remove all warnings in case it had an impact. I would like to keep it because of the warning, but I will take it out if you request.

Addition: When I check out websites that already use JSON-LD, I note that they use dateModified even if it is the same as the publish date.

view-source:http://www.theverge.com/2017/4/3/15123170/bmw-520i-2017-5-series-review

The difference between this plugin and The Verge is that they control every aspect of their site, and this plugin has to serve a more general use case. We have no way of knowing that a document’s date is the same as (or even a good approximation of) its updated date. I assert that the absence of data is better than made up daya.

When you say “Google will complain,” do you mean validation fails, or Google complains loudly? If validation fails, I guess we'll do what's needed to fix that. If it's merely a warning, that seems like A Good Thing! Publishers should be made aware that including modified information is an important thing to do, and we can't just hand-wave over that.

It's merely a warning.

That is a valid point that the document's date is not the same as its upload date.

I will pull that last default snippet to exclude the page.date.

benbalter

Nice work! Thanks for working through the feedback.

aav7fl · 2017-04-04T15:49:48Z

Thanks for working with me on this!

aav7fl · 2017-04-04T17:16:51Z

@pathawks Date handling complete. Thanks for pointing out that the file date may not properly represent the publish date; and all of the other valid points that I missed along the way!

benbalter · 2017-04-06T18:59:35Z

Think this can be merged now?

aav7fl · 2017-04-06T19:01:20Z

It looks good to me. 😃

pathawks · 2017-04-06T19:02:11Z

@benbalter Yes, LGTM. Sorry; I didn't realize that I was the one holding things up.

@aav7fl Thanks for making those changes, and for your patience. This will be a great addition to the plugin 👍🎉

benbalter · 2017-04-06T19:02:19Z

Thanks @aav7fl! 🥇 🌵 🍰

benbalter · 2017-04-06T19:02:27Z

Going to get a new release out right now with this in it.

ghost · 2017-04-06T19:03:31Z

\o/

aav7fl added 2 commits January 16, 2017 17:18

Fix Google Structured Data Requests

f82ea47

Fixes missing author and name in blogPosting types with organization.

Fix typo. Oops.

8d2febf

pathawks reviewed Jan 16, 2017

View reviewed changes

Fix word casing

2ddab03

aav7fl commented Jan 16, 2017

View reviewed changes

pathawks approved these changes Jan 16, 2017

View reviewed changes

aav7fl changed the title ~~Add Author/Name tags in JSON metadata~~ Add tags to JSON metadata Jan 17, 2017

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017

View reviewed changes

Fix language mistake

30d4ffc

Well.... looks like I added an 'e'. Whoops.

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017

View reviewed changes

Add pull request documentation

a2a2c56

Adds documentation on new image behavior, dateModified, and author field.

aav7fl added 4 commits January 18, 2017 14:14

Add test for image object with dimensions

8cc9b2d

Wite tests for implemented features.

9aa2cbf

Travis doesn't like my timestamps for testing.

10d5f82

Match rubocop styling.

b04f739

aav7fl added 3 commits January 25, 2017 11:05

Test output manually with Google Markup. Change inferred type. Improv…

fd5246a

…e test coverage

Implement PR #103 for my own use. Change template to better fit exist…

5437934

…ing style.

Add test for PR #103

644e976

aav7fl commented Jan 25, 2017

View reviewed changes

pathawks requested changes Jan 25, 2017

View reviewed changes

Remove Author tag. I guess it really isn't used anymore.

a0f6588

aav7fl and others added 2 commits April 3, 2017 13:11

Merge branch 'master' into master

e8e54a9

Image changes should be removed

48ba285

Merge branch 'master' into master

ac0886d

ghost reviewed Apr 3, 2017

View reviewed changes

Clarify documentation

bc32658

pathawks requested changes Apr 3, 2017

View reviewed changes

Separate tests.

6009b49

benbalter approved these changes Apr 4, 2017

View reviewed changes

benbalter mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2017

Add og:locale support #166

Merged

aav7fl and others added 2 commits April 4, 2017 11:51

Merge branch 'master' into master

9ec685a

Remove date default handle

61d4c91

Merge branch 'master' into master

5b2e8f3

pathawks approved these changes Apr 6, 2017

View reviewed changes

benbalter merged commit 11cd72c into jekyll:master Apr 6, 2017

aav7fl mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2017

Warning: The attribute image.itemtype has an invalid value. #183

Closed

aav7fl mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2018

Should allow publisher to be a Person #304

Closed

jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2019

jekyllbot added the frozen-due-to-age label Apr 29, 2019

Add tags to JSON metadata #151

Add tags to JSON metadata #151

Conversation

aav7fl commented Jan 16, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pathawks commented Jan 16, 2017

aav7fl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl commented Jan 16, 2017

pathawks commented Jan 16, 2017

aav7fl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017 • edited

aav7fl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017 • edited

aav7fl commented Jan 18, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

DirtyF Jan 25, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl commented Jan 25, 2017

aav7fl commented Apr 3, 2017 • edited

ghost Apr 3, 2017 • edited by ghost

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ghost commented Apr 3, 2017

aav7fl commented Apr 3, 2017

pathawks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

benbalter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aav7fl commented Apr 4, 2017 • edited

aav7fl commented Apr 4, 2017

benbalter commented Apr 6, 2017

aav7fl commented Apr 6, 2017

pathawks commented Apr 6, 2017

benbalter commented Apr 6, 2017

benbalter commented Apr 6, 2017

ghost commented Apr 6, 2017

aav7fl commented Jan 16, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl commented Jan 17, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl commented Jan 18, 2017 •

edited

DirtyF Jan 25, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl commented Apr 3, 2017 •

edited

ghost Apr 3, 2017 •

edited by ghost

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl Apr 3, 2017 •

edited

aav7fl commented Apr 4, 2017 •

edited