Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Supporting more kramdown options. #1201
So, the more you stare at the function the more awesome it becomes. The magic comes from delete(key) because it actually returns the value of what it deletes. So, returning the value from what we delete now sets the symbolized key to that value!
I don't think we need every possible option. Ultimately, we just need to verify the they're in the hash properly. It's kramdown's responsibility to handle its own options.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zach firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Here is what I am going to do gents:
Then I will run the test suite (lol @ my spelling mistake) again to see if anything has broken.
I will have this done for you tomorrow! Apologies for the delay.
On Jul 12, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Parker Moore email@example.com wrote:
Also I found that we are already testing kramdown options here:
So what I decided on was deep_merging in a new option in:
Then I try to run this sort of test
I was hoping that the kramdown would strip the
If one of you is around on IRC tonight I think I could wrap this up fairly quickly but I need some help.