-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not process Liquid in post excerpt when disabled in front matter #7146
Conversation
Take a look at some of the existing tests for excerpts and the test that I added for disabled Liquid and see if you can figure out what kind of test needs to be added. If that isn't enough to get you started, please @ me and I can help you out 🍻 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
How do we want to list this in the |
It’s bring the other enhancement to be more feature complete. Maybe don’t
list it but modify the original changelog to include this ticket as well?
…On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:24 PM Pat Hawks ***@***.***> wrote:
How do we want to list this in the v4.0.0 changelog? It is a follow-up to
#6824 <#6824>, which won't be
included until v4, so I worry that listing this as a bugfix might be
misleading. I also don't want to be tempted to backport this to v3.8.x
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7146 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKeM1-CjXcaxacrVBVfv_VMzXU683mh6ks5uIlivgaJpZM4VS_2e>
.
|
@jekyllbot: 🚢 +feature |
Lines 85 to 88 in fe0a6ca
The features are listed consecutively in |
Wait a second... sigh |
@pathawks I know this isn’t the right forum but is their a way in which excerpt can be changed so that we process the liquid once between excerpt and the full page? It seems a bit like extra leg work many people might not ever make use of anyways. Seems like potential performance to be had for larger sites. |
@kenman345 That might be a good idea 👍 |
I will take a deep dive into it and see what shakes out. I’ll open a PR if
I feel comfortable with a proposed change to squeeze away the extra cycles
this adds.
…On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM Pat Hawks ***@***.***> wrote:
@kenman345 <https://github.com/kenman345> That might be a good idea 👍
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7146 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKeM18RlkUgB46nIAjc1cCUth8E7uWrEks5uImmQgaJpZM4VS_2e>
.
|
As noted in #6824 the latest feature to disable liquid rendering did not extend to excerpts. This is a bit of a simple copy and past of logic. I do not exactly understand how to add the updated tests for it but figured someone might be able to help me move it along.