Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refresh the 'New item' page #9111

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor

@janfaracik janfaracik commented Apr 1, 2024

Small pull request to refresh the 'New item' page. Largely some SCSS changes to bring it more inline with the rest of Jenkins, as well as some minor JS changes.

Before
image

After
image

  • Added a page heading and breadcrumb item
  • Removed the always present 'Required field' text
  • Removed the icon background
  • Sticky bottom bar has been replaced with the bottomButtonBar component

Testing done

  • Works as before, needs passing tests

Proposed changelog entries

  • Refresh the 'New item' page.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Submitter checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
    Options
  2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
    Options
  3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
    Options
  4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
    Options
  5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
    Options
  6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
    Options
  7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
    Options
  8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
    Options

Desired reviewers

@jenkinsci/sig-ux

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Maintainer checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
    Options
  2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
    Options
  3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
    Options
  4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
    Options
  5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
    Options
  6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).
    Options

@timja timja added web-ui The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted labels Apr 2, 2024
@timja timja requested a review from a team April 2, 2024 07:29
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not ran locally but screenshots look good, what's with the empty functions?

war/src/main/js/add-item.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
war/src/main/js/add-item.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Design is far from perfect but I think it's a step in the right direction - if anybody has any ideas happy to hear them.

The items are loaded in by JS - anybody know the reason why this is over just loading them in via Jelly? Any performance considerations?

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Apr 2, 2024

The items are loaded in by JS - anybody know the reason why this is over just loading them in via Jelly? Any performance considerations?

I think it was being done in the 2.x refresh which was when the setup wizard came in so likely it was using similar paradigms and approaches to it.

@NotMyFault
Copy link
Member

Unrelated to this pr, but related to future cleanups: https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-72947

@timja timja added the needs-security-review Awaiting review by a security team member label Apr 3, 2024
@timja timja requested a review from a team April 3, 2024 13:03
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@timja timja requested a review from a team April 3, 2024 13:11
Copy link
Contributor

@yaroslavafenkin yaroslavafenkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK security wise.

@yaroslavafenkin yaroslavafenkin added security-approved @jenkinsci/core-security-review reviewed this PR for security issues and removed needs-security-review Awaiting review by a security team member labels Apr 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@NotMyFault NotMyFault left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge. We will merge it after ~24 hours if there is no negative feedback.
Please see the merge process documentation for more information about the merge process.
Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Apr 3, 2024
@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

daniel-beck commented Apr 4, 2024

Animations for keyboard navigation on this page looks weird because of close/overlapping focus boxes for the item types. Is this intentional?

Also pointing out that removing the .flat class from the div results in item grouping. #5083 intended to implement that, but circumstances at the time resulted it in me having to postpone it.

It looks reasonable to me but perhaps not up to your standards, PTAL Screenshot 2024-04-04 at 11 52 41

(Neither are blocking.)

@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Animations for keyboard navigation on this page looks weird because of close/overlapping focus boxes for the item types. Is this intentional?

Also pointing out that removing the .flat class from the div results in item grouping. #5083 intended to implement that, but circumstances at the time resulted it in me having to postpone it.

It looks reasonable to me but perhaps not up to your standards, PTAL
(Neither are blocking.)

Good spot about the border overlapping, I've increased the spacing a touch to account for that.

As for grouping, I think it looks alright for now - can always revisit in the future.

@NotMyFault NotMyFault merged commit 864b275 into jenkinsci:master Apr 5, 2024
17 checks passed
@janfaracik janfaracik deleted the tidy-new-item-page branch April 5, 2024 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted security-approved @jenkinsci/core-security-review reviewed this PR for security issues web-ui The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise
Projects
None yet
5 participants