You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From my reading of http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/NamedPatch it seems that
darcs considers two patches to be the "same" if the have the same log
message, timestamp, and author.
So, on a gitit wiki with a darcs backend, a bot could theoretically make
two edits in quick succession, within less than a second, with the same log
message, and thus create two patches that darcs would incorrectly consider
equal.
Google Code Info:
Issue #: 27
Author: gree...@gmail.com
Created On: 2009-02-12T15:21:45.000Z
Closed On: 2009-02-13T03:11:29.000Z
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I asked in #darcs about this and it turns out that darcs >2.1 adds a random noise
line to every patch log - so this shouldn't ever happen. Please close this issue.
Google Code Info:
Author: gree...@gmail.com
Created On: 2009-02-12T15:51:22.000Z
From my reading of http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/NamedPatch it seems that
darcs considers two patches to be the "same" if the have the same log
message, timestamp, and author.
So, on a gitit wiki with a darcs backend, a bot could theoretically make
two edits in quick succession, within less than a second, with the same log
message, and thus create two patches that darcs would incorrectly consider
equal.
Google Code Info:
Issue #: 27
Author: gree...@gmail.com
Created On: 2009-02-12T15:21:45.000Z
Closed On: 2009-02-13T03:11:29.000Z
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: