You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I saw in another comment, ways to broadly filter the list would be helpful.
I assume this was your goal in filtering with/without number row. But with programmable and blank keys, it's a bit subjective since a 4x6 may or may not be intended or used with a numpad.
A row count CAN avoid the complexity of thumb keys and corner key tweaks. It also isn't impacted by row staggering and the many accompanying odd key widths. In order to keep the number clean and non-subjective, the count could be based on the upper outside corner, except in by one column and down by one row. It sounds finicky but it's fairly simple and avoids almost all issues.
Currently there's only one that I would break the rule on. I'd give Xenon a 3.5 for row count. You could use an asterisk for occasional oddities that may not quite fit the rule, or have an "other" category, or leave it blank (if you're okay with the dreaded null value).
Otherwise, if you like it, I did the legwork already:
Name
BasicRowCount
Absolem
3
Arch 36
3
Atreus
4
Claw44
3
Corne
3
DracuLad
3
Dygma Raise
5
Elephant 42
3
Ergodash 1
5
Ergodash 2
5
Ergodox
5
Ergoslab
5
Ergotravel
4
Ferris
3
Georgi
2
Gergo
3
Gergoplex
3
Ginny
1
Interphase
5
Iris
4
Keyboardio Model01
4
Keyseebee
3
Kyria
3
Lily58
4
Microdox
3
Minidox
3
Mitosis
3
Moonlander
5
Nyquist
5
Quefrency R1
5
Quefrency R2
5
Redox
5
Reviung 39
3
Reviung 41
3
Sinc
6
Sofle
4
Sol2
5
Squiggle
3
Torn
3
Viterbi
5
Xenon
3.5
Zen 2
5
Zygomorph
5
Thanks again for this super cool tool!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As I saw in another comment, ways to broadly filter the list would be helpful.
I assume this was your goal in filtering with/without number row. But with programmable and blank keys, it's a bit subjective since a 4x6 may or may not be intended or used with a numpad.
A row count CAN avoid the complexity of thumb keys and corner key tweaks. It also isn't impacted by row staggering and the many accompanying odd key widths. In order to keep the number clean and non-subjective, the count could be based on the upper outside corner, except in by one column and down by one row. It sounds finicky but it's fairly simple and avoids almost all issues.
Currently there's only one that I would break the rule on. I'd give Xenon a 3.5 for row count. You could use an asterisk for occasional oddities that may not quite fit the rule, or have an "other" category, or leave it blank (if you're okay with the dreaded null value).
Otherwise, if you like it, I did the legwork already:
Thanks again for this super cool tool!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: