New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: remove unique id #1872
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1872 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.17% 86.33% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 146 145 -1
Lines 6982 6925 -57
==========================================
- Hits 6017 5979 -38
+ Misses 965 946 -19
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Latency summaryCurrent PR yields:
Breakdown
Backed by latency-tracking. Further commits will update this comment. |
match_idx = [] # type: List[Tuple[UniqueId, UniqueId, UniqueId, float]] | ||
query_meta = {} # type: Dict[UniqueId, Dict] | ||
match_meta = {} # type: Dict[UniqueId, Dict] | ||
match_idx = [] # type: List[Tuple[str, str, str, float]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are these types assigned behind a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but why are they comments in this case? They only reason to do that is if we want to support Python 2. Anyway, not a big deal
Breaking Changes #1606