refactor(proto): remove content_hash from builtin proto

[hanxiao]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3058 (8fd5ecd) into master (b205a19) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 90.90%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3058      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.53%   89.46%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         142      142              
  Lines        9515     9503      -12     
==========================================
- Hits         8519     8502      -17     
- Misses        996     1001       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
daemon	43.94% <36.36%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
jina	89.45% <90.90%> (-0.07%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jina/proto/jina_pb2.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
jina/types/arrays/match.py	95.45% <ø> (-0.38%)	⬇️
jina/types/arrays/chunk.py	89.28% <80.00%> (-3.31%)	⬇️
jina/types/document/__init__.py	96.13% <85.71%> (-0.42%)	⬇️
jina/clients/base/websocket.py	86.36% <100.00%> (ø)
jina/clients/request/helper.py	83.92% <100.00%> (-0.56%)	⬇️
jina/proto/serializer.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
jina/types/arrays/document.py	90.18% <100.00%> (ø)
jina/types/document/multimodal.py	95.91% <100.00%> (-0.38%)	⬇️
jina/types/message/__init__.py	87.25% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b205a19...8fd5ecd. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Latency summary

Current PR yields:

• 😶 index QPS at 1785, delta to last 2 avg.: -1%
• 🐎🐎🐎🐎 query QPS at 46, delta to last 2 avg.: +104%
• 🐎🐎🐎🐎 dam extend QPS at 84630, delta to last 2 avg.: +19%
• 🐎🐎🐎🐎 avg flow time within 1.4736 seconds, delta to last 2 avg.: +5%
• 🐢🐢 import jina within 0.305 seconds, delta to last 2 avg.: -7%

Breakdown

Version	Index QPS	Query QPS	DAM Extend QPS	Avg Flow Time (s)	Import Time (s)
current	1785	46	84630	1.4736	0.305
2.0.13	1603	19	63021	1.3261	0.3682
2.0.12	2015	25	78135	1.458	0.293

Backed by latency-tracking. Further commits will update this comment.

[bwanglzu]

how about add @cached_property the content hash?

[hanxiao]

how about add @cached_property the content hash?

no, that will introduce inconsistency issue, leads to more bug. In general, @cached_property always leads to inconsistency to some extent, but in this case Document fields change much more frequently than other cases. so no.