Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to guarantee the relative size between different quantiles in MQ-RNN? #14

Open
Goofy321 opened this issue Nov 26, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Goofy321
Copy link

There is a fixed relationship between different quantiles. For example, P90 should be bigger than P10. So how to guarantee this relationship in MQ-RNN, where different quantiles are forecasted at the same time?

@jingw2
Copy link
Owner

jingw2 commented Dec 4, 2020

What I understand is to use quantile loss to control the relative relationship between quantiles. MQ-RNN could directly output results of different quantiles from the network.

@Goofy321
Copy link
Author

Goofy321 commented Dec 4, 2020

Yes. I can understand that by using quantile loss as the objective function, the network is trained in the direction of predicting different quantiles. And we believe a well-trained network can meet the requriment of the relative relationship between quantiles most of the time. What worries me is whether the network can output quantiles with expected relative relationship always? I mean, for every sample.

@2017wxyzwxyz
Copy link

2017wxyzwxyz commented Mar 9, 2021

@Goofy321,Please send me your code, thank you very much! My e-mail address is NewWxy2016@163.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants