-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jitpack LOST a build #5973
Comments
I'm seeing failed requests for both old and new builds. Fairly random: some artifacts load, others don't. After years of using Jitpack I'm moving my projects to Maven Central. Huge PITA, but I feel like Jitpack reliability has worsened recently. |
I'm also experiencing this issue. Our app uses CacheFileProvider 0.2 and we are unable to build without this dependency. I would love to have a solution for this. |
In the meantime the build did vanish completely and trying to open the log file did trigger a rebuild... sadly it does not build anymore because the used gradle version to build the library is not the same anymore as in the past (I assume). Sadly I did not define a gradle wrapper back then when I wrote the problematic version... Nevertheless, the successful build did vanish for no reason... |
I would be very grateful if this issue is resolved. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This seems to be a bigger issue, I jsut wanted to comile another old oroject of mine, updated gradle from 7 to 8 and tried to compile it and following can not be found anymore:
Same for https://jitpack.io/com/github/MFlisar/MaterialPreferences/screen-input/0.5.4/screen-input-0.5.4.pom And the issue occurs for all modules that belong the respectve library... |
Yeah, I have some missing builds as well. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale. |
Describe the bug
One old version build of one of my libraries suddenly got lost... I know it did work in the past because I used this version quite some time myself.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
The old build should still be available
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: