You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Parker convention was previously used for the conversion of xml to json format, in order for documents to be imported to database. Sadly, as far as xml arguments are concerned, the convention mentioned above is lossy (it complete ignores them). Thus, there is no way to identify the type of enrolment in each clinical study ("actual","anticipated", e.t.c.) using the current form of db.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The need for the adaptation of a new json format is obvious and the final decision is the use of the GData convention. Here's an instructive wiki about XML to JSON conventions, where various option are mentioned (GData, Badgerfish, e.t.c.).
Parker convention was previously used for the conversion of xml to json format, in order for documents to be imported to database. Sadly, as far as xml arguments are concerned, the convention mentioned above is lossy (it complete ignores them). Thus, there is no way to identify the type of enrolment in each clinical study ("actual","anticipated", e.t.c.) using the current form of db.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: