You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
dbietila is working on a spec for an updated Marc-to-Dublin-Core transform for the social scientists maps: this should override the base Marc-to-DC transform as little as possible.
DC fields that appear in linked data triples will be updated after this spec is complete. Questions for specific DC fields are included below:
dc:creator
As per dbietila, creator should include alpha subfields from Marc 100, 110, and 111. The base transform currently includes a line to bring in 245c as well. Should this stay, or should it be removed?
dc:description
The dc:description field is spec'ed out differently in different places. In the base MARC-to-DC transform, and in the maps-specific transform, should every 5xx$a-$z field and subfield be concatenated into a single dc:description element? (Alternatively, should each 5xx produce an individual dc:description? Or should just the 500 produce a dc:description?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dbietila is working on a spec for an updated Marc-to-Dublin-Core transform for the social scientists maps: this should override the base Marc-to-DC transform as little as possible.
DC fields that appear in linked data triples will be updated after this spec is complete. Questions for specific DC fields are included below:
dc:creator
As per dbietila, creator should include alpha subfields from Marc 100, 110, and 111. The base transform currently includes a line to bring in 245c as well. Should this stay, or should it be removed?
dc:description
The dc:description field is spec'ed out differently in different places. In the base MARC-to-DC transform, and in the maps-specific transform, should every 5xx$a-$z field and subfield be concatenated into a single dc:description element? (Alternatively, should each 5xx produce an individual dc:description? Or should just the 500 produce a dc:description?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: