-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Calculating MWIS becomes slow #8
Comments
Hi, I will be implementing other parameters soon that should speed it up, see issue #7 |
Thank you so much. Look forward to the update. I also want to know how to set the parameters of gating area, k, q, r, and n. However, I got track 0 to 7 in my output file, which is weird. Do you have any ideas how to solve this problem? Thanks a lot! |
Hi, below are more details on the parameters, and please browse the paper for specifics on tuning these. I would try increasing K if your measurements have high accuracy, and increasing N for a higher accuracy solution (but slower runtime) as well. I am currently working on adding the Bth and Nmiss parameters which should improve performance as well. I'm also adding the parameters as command-line arguments so you can test different values more easily. ParametersModify parameters by editing the file params.txt:
Kalman filter parameters:
Track tree pruning parameters:
|
I will test with your inputs as well |
Any updates on speeding up the MWIS calculation? Are the new parameters included, and if so how do I specify them? |
Still working on this, sorry! |
@Engineero I have added two missing pruning parameters from the paper: Bth for setting the maximum number of branches, and Nmiss for the maximum number of consecutive frames with missing observations for a track in commit 5627c53. Please try adjusting these parameters to improve performance. |
Hi, I have tried this code on my dataset which has 100 frames. The maximum observations is 4. I noticed that the calculating MWIS procedure becames really slow after frame 49. Here are the parameters I set:
image_area = 422288 # Image width x height in pixels
gating_area = 1 # Gating area for new detections
k = 0 # Gain or blending factor
q = 0.00001 # Kalman filter process variance
r = 0.01 # Estimate of measurement variance
n = 1 # N-scan pruning parameter
Would you suggest me change any parameters to make it run faster? Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: