Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

importance sampling #24

Closed
joshspeagle opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

importance sampling #24

joshspeagle opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@joshspeagle
Labels
enhancement upgrades and improvements

Comments

@joshspeagle
Copy link
Owner

While dynamic sampling might eliminate the need for this, I want to make sure I keep things structured so this is still possible. The idea is that once we have a results object (or more generally a list of samples and associated proposals) that we'll be able to run this over the results to get additional "bonus" weights as an add-on. This should be fine as long as I keep track of all the rejected proposals during each iteration.
@joshspeagle joshspeagle added this to the importance sampling milestone May 15, 2017
@joshspeagle joshspeagle self-assigned this May 15, 2017
@joshspeagle joshspeagle added the enhancement upgrades and improvements label May 15, 2017
@joshspeagle
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing this issue for now since dynamic sampling seems to be working well. The general structure of the code is at least set up so that going this route should be possible in the future if we really feel so inclined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@joshspeagle joshspeagle

Labels
enhancement upgrades and improvements
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@joshspeagle