Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jQuery.parseJSON: Added deprecation note for jQuery 3 #899

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AurelioDeRosa
Copy link
Member

Fixes gh-898

@dmethvin
Copy link
Member

👍

AurelioDeRosa added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2016
@AurelioDeRosa
Copy link
Member Author

The PR has been merged in the branch v3.0.0-docs.

@AurelioDeRosa AurelioDeRosa deleted the parseJSON branch March 14, 2016 02:24
AurelioDeRosa added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2016
timmywil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2016
@mgol
Copy link
Member

mgol commented Jul 13, 2016

Now that I look at it... On other pages we put the deprecation message at the top so that it's immediately obvious not to use the API. I think we should move this one to the top as well.

mgol added a commit to mgol/api.jquery.com that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2016
The deprecation note has been moved to the top of the description as it's the
most important information about the API. This is also how other pages for
deprecated APIs are documented.

Also, the message has been rephrased a little as JSON is a string, not an
object.

Ref jquery#899
@mgol
Copy link
Member

mgol commented Nov 23, 2016

@dmethvin @AurelioDeRosa PTAL at #1000.

mgol added a commit to mgol/api.jquery.com that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2016
The deprecation note has been moved to the top of the description as it's the
most important information about the API. This is also how other pages for
deprecated APIs are documented.

Also, the message has been rephrased a little as JSON is a string, not an
object.

Ref jquery#899
Closes jquery#1000
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants