-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider removing rendered docs from main branch and from the history #370
Comments
Would definitely be an improvement. Thinking about using a dedicated repo and a git submodule in a first step. |
I'm not sure what would be the use of submodule then. Moving the full documentation (generated documentation for all the versions) to a different repository might be a nice idea though. |
The submodule will allow keeping the documentation publishing as is: First generate it through Gradle, then copy it to the docs directory (which is a sub-module). |
Some experimentation showed that a submodule will make some handling more difficult so I just move all rendered docs to a different repo (currently private). |
Is there any advantage in having the website repo public? |
See https://github.com/pricing#compare-features Pages for private repository requires a paid plan. |
I worked with submodules multiple times, and I incline they are rarely a good idea. For the documentation, it looks like a separate repo with pages would work ok |
I already moved it to a private repo, so the question is should I make this repo public? |
If private works for you, then it is fine. I've no idea what would be the pros and cons of making the pages repository private. |
Testing Problem
Currently, jqwik working directory consumes ~200M for
docs/
by javadocs of all the versions.It would be nice if the generated documentation could be removed from the git repository (and from the history) so checkout is faster, and it would not consume space on the developers' machines.
If you really want to keep the generated javadoc for all the revisions in git, it would be nice if you could use a different branch for that.
Removal of
javadoc
andkdoc
folders yields the following.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: